text | no gfx | gfx
mast image on inside pages
Contact Us       Site Map      Search
The Portfolio      Portfolio Tour      Portfolio FAQ      Portfolio Info    Discussion Boards
  HOME >  DISCUSSION_BOARDS >  MARKERS DISCUSSION BOARD  >  QUESTIONS >  COMMENT
 Printer Friendly Format

   

   Reply to: Re: ARE ANY OF THE PROPOSED MARKERS UNNECESSARY?
Posted by garrison greenwood on Sunday May 05, @08:51AM
from the dept.
I'm not sure how some of these markers are going to be evaluated. For example, the "sustainable environment" marker sounds good, but how is this marker met?

I sincerely hope people don't advocate another course be added to the cirriculum to ensure markers are met. Engineering programs are already tightly controlled by the ABET accreditation requirements, which means adding another course would be extremely difficult.

Name
Email
Notify Notify me via email of responses to this message
Title
Comment
(Check those URLs! Don't forget the http://!)
Encoding
If none of the above mean anything to you, select 'Plain'!
Allowed HTML <B> <I> <P> <A> <LI> <OL> <UL> <EM> <BR> <TT> <HR> <STRONG> <BLOCKQUOTE> <DIV .*> <DIV> <P .*>
Important Stuff:
  • Note: Fields with bold titles are required.
  • Please try to keep posts on topic.
  • Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads,
  • Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
  • Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
  • Please do not post offtopic, inflammatory, inappropriate, illegal, or offensive comments. Repeat offenders will be sanctioned.
    •  

    Portland State University Home
    Maintained by: i-portfolio@pdx.edu
    Last Updated: April 14, 2006
    Website Credits
    		 Powered by Zope